NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Economy

The Fed Needs a Single Mandate

by August 22, 2022
written by August 22, 2022
First published by The Hill

Inflation continues its relentless march, eating away at workers’ wages. Consumer prices rose 9.1 percent year-over-year in June, the fastest since 1981. The median American household is now losing more than $2,700 per year in purchasing power. As always, regular Americans are stuck with the tab for reckless monetary and fiscal policy.

The Federal Reserve is primarily responsible for inflation. Even with aggressive interest rate hikes, the central bank is behind the curve. The money supply has risen more than 40 percent in two years, far outpacing the market’s demand for liquidity. Inflation is the predictable effect. Congress is partly to blame, too. Politicians have run up nearly $6 trillion in deficits since the coronavirus pandemic. The Fed scooped up Treasury securities totaling more than half of that deficit spending. Money mischief and fiscal folly reinforce each other.

To beat inflation, one reform stands out in importance. It’s time for legislators to give the Fed a single mandate focusing on price stability. With inflation this high, we can’t afford any more distractions for the central bank. The Fed needs focus. Stabilizing the dollar’s purchasing power must come first.

The Fed is chasing too many goals. Its monetary mandate, which comes from a 1977 act of Congress, requires monetary policymakers to pursue maximum employment and stable prices. But this is redundant: The only way the Fed can secure the former is through the latter. By expanding the money supply when total spending in the economy stalls, the Fed stabilizes the exchange rate of money against goods in general — the “price” of a dollar.

Labor markets have nothing to fear from an inflation-focused Fed. Contrary to what some politicians and economists assert, there is no tradeoff between inflation and unemployment. While that idea was fashionable as recently as the 1970s, advancements in scientific economics have long since put it to rest. 

The number of jobs is determined by the availability of capital and natural resources, the productivity of our technology and the commercial friendliness of our laws. None of these depend on how fast the Fed prints money. The best thing the central bank can do is make a credible commitment to stabilize the dollar’s value, setting a strong foundation for job-creating economic activity.

A stable, predictable price level keeps the economy as productive as possible, including labor markets. Thus, the employment plank of the Fed’s mandate is superfluous at best and dangerous at worst. It gives central bankers an excuse to pick winners and losers while neglecting the one thing within their sphere of competence: the dollar’s purchasing power.

A dual mandate inhibits price stability by giving the Fed a plausible excuse for its mistakes. Targeting employment increases partisanship pressure on the Fed and has led to calls from Congress and the Biden administration to incorporate diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) into Fed policy. Recent Fed chairs, including Jerome Powell, rightly denied that monetary policy was capable of achieving these goals. The Fed’s move to a more “inclusive” employment target has contributed to our current predicament.

Opponents of a rule-bound Fed worry that a price stability mandate can cause the Fed to inadvertently tighten in response to supply problems. As the past year has shown us, however, the Fed cannot be trusted to return to low inflation once a supply shock occurs, even going so far as to refine its own targets for inflation and employment to cover up its blunders. For example, the Fed insists it wants to “achieve inflation that averages 2 percent over time.” But since the Fed refuses to specify a concrete path for the dollar’s purchasing power, this is cheap talk. Any policy can be reconciled after the fact with an objective this vague.

They say a man with one watch always knows what time it is, but a man with two watches is never quite sure. It’s time for Congress to give the Fed one, and only one, new watch. A purchasing target would direct the Fed towards an achievable goal that would improve American households’ material wellbeing. Legislators from both parties should make a single Fed mandate a key part of their agendas.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Charles Hoskinson to Cardano SPOs: Let’s get Vasil done
next post
Bitcoin price: here’s what a closely watched technical indicator suggests

You may also like

Government Siphon Targets Corporate Stock Buybacks

February 8, 2023

Is the Debt Ceiling Lunacy?

February 8, 2023

Book Review: How the “Chip War” Vindicates Economics

February 7, 2023

Be Grateful that First Responders and Teachers Earn...

February 7, 2023

The Not-So-Great Depression Diet

February 6, 2023

The Age of Decline

February 6, 2023

1619 Project: A Flawed Interpretation With a Hidden...

February 5, 2023

Words, Numbers, and Samuel Gregg

February 4, 2023

The Tragedy of the Monetary Commons

February 4, 2023

Supply Constraints and Inflation, Revisited

February 3, 2023
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Popular Posts

  • 1

    My Trigger to Enter $VAPR

  • 2

    Multi-Millionaire Trader Explains Why You Should Start Trading With A Small Account {VIDEO}

  • 3

    Scaling Up Tips From A 24-Year Old Millionaire Trader {VIDEO}

  • 4

    Pay Attention to These Stocks

  • 5

    New ‘Hunger Winter’ Looms as Europe Prepares to Shiver

Recent Posts

  • Disney Q1 earnings report: ‘this stock is unmatched anywhere else’

    February 9, 2023
  • Bank of America sees a 50% upside in this travel stock

    February 8, 2023
  • Google stock loses 9.0% after it’s A.I event: buy the dip?

    February 8, 2023
  • Ex-Coinbase manager pleads guilty to insider trading charges

    February 8, 2023
  • U.K. CMA issues provisional decision on Microsoft-Activision deal

    February 8, 2023

Categories

  • Economy (615)
  • Editor's Pick (235)
  • Investing (1,639)
  • Stock (9)
  • About Us
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contacts

Disclaimer: NewTradingView.com, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2023 NewTradingView.com All Rights Reserved.


Back To Top
NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick