NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Economy

There Is No Such Thing As Student Debt Cancellation

by September 19, 2022
written by September 19, 2022

President Biden finally announced his promised student debt relief program. The government will forgive up to $20,000 of student debt for Pell Grant recipients, and up to $10,000 for others with an annual income below $125,000 ($250,000 if married). On top of this, he is extending the grace period on student loan repayment until the end of the year. The plan is estimated to cost $24 billion per year for a decade, for a total of $240 billion.

The victory lap surrounding the announcement suggests the government does not fully understand its own policy. Consider two representative politicians, Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren, who describe Biden’s policy as debt “cancellation.” Recent columns in Forbes and CNET show similar statements. The word “cancel” is very telling; it gives the impression that student debt disappears. The cancellation narrative is reinforced by advocates talking about the benefits of the debt relief, while remaining silent about its costs. There is no such thing as debt cancellation. The loan will be repaid. The only question is who will foot the bill. Recognizing that the Biden administration’s policy merely shifts the burden from some Americans to other Americans, the economic and ethical questions involved are more salient than many realize.

The student debt forgiveness policy means the government will forgo roughly $240 billion in payments over the next decade. How will it deal with this revenue shortfall?? There are a few possibilities. The government may:

Cut spendingRaise taxesIssue debtCreate money

The options are not mutually exclusive. The government might employ some combination of the four. But, no matter how you slice it, that $240 billion dollars will come from somewhere. Basic accounting requires it.

Further, the idea that the government is footing the bill for this policy is a bit misleading. The cost of the program does not fall on the government. It falls on those who miss out on expenditures that would have otherwise occurred, those who pay higher taxes as a result of the program, those who pay higher interest rates or are crowded out due to additional government borrowing, or those who see the purchasing power of their dollars reduced more than usual.

Remember, the government cannot give without taking.

Biden’s student debt forgiveness policy raises important ethical questions. For example, individuals making up to $125,000 a year qualify. But median income in the United States is only around $45,000. Why should low income Americans pay for loans taken out by those who earn much more? 

There are other equity issues, as well. Some students and graduates sacrificed consumption to pay down their loans more quickly and, as a result, will not see as much of their debt forgiven. Those who made the minimum payments or no payments at all will benefit. Those who have repaid their loans in full receive nothing. Why are those who have repaid their loans less deserving of financial assistance than those who haven’t?

Further, the possibility that such a policy will be enacted again seems likely to create further problems. Lawrence White predicts individuals will be more inclined to take out larger loans, at higher rates, because there is now a greater chance that Uncle Sam will force someone else to pay for it at some point in the future.

There is no denying that some Americans are struggling, and some of those struggling have student debt. If the Biden administration is genuinely concerned about those struggling, it could provide greater assistance to those with low incomes. If it is genuinely concerned with those struggling to repay their student loans, it could have phased out the debt forgiveness over a much lower income threshold. That it took neither of these paths suggests it is primarily concerned with winning votes from educated elites in the next election at the expense of everyone else.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Ankr partners with Polygon to drive Web3 adoption via Supernets
next post
Jim Cramer is now ‘short’ Nvidia stock

You may also like

Government Siphon Targets Corporate Stock Buybacks

February 8, 2023

Is the Debt Ceiling Lunacy?

February 8, 2023

Book Review: How the “Chip War” Vindicates Economics

February 7, 2023

Be Grateful that First Responders and Teachers Earn...

February 7, 2023

The Not-So-Great Depression Diet

February 6, 2023

The Age of Decline

February 6, 2023

1619 Project: A Flawed Interpretation With a Hidden...

February 5, 2023

Words, Numbers, and Samuel Gregg

February 4, 2023

The Tragedy of the Monetary Commons

February 4, 2023

Supply Constraints and Inflation, Revisited

February 3, 2023
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Popular Posts

  • 1

    My Trigger to Enter $VAPR

  • 2

    Multi-Millionaire Trader Explains Why You Should Start Trading With A Small Account {VIDEO}

  • 3

    Scaling Up Tips From A 24-Year Old Millionaire Trader {VIDEO}

  • 4

    Pay Attention to These Stocks

  • 5

    New ‘Hunger Winter’ Looms as Europe Prepares to Shiver

Recent Posts

  • Disney Q1 earnings report: ‘this stock is unmatched anywhere else’

    February 9, 2023
  • Bank of America sees a 50% upside in this travel stock

    February 8, 2023
  • Google stock loses 9.0% after it’s A.I event: buy the dip?

    February 8, 2023
  • Ex-Coinbase manager pleads guilty to insider trading charges

    February 8, 2023
  • U.K. CMA issues provisional decision on Microsoft-Activision deal

    February 8, 2023

Categories

  • Economy (615)
  • Editor's Pick (235)
  • Investing (1,639)
  • Stock (9)
  • About Us
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contacts

Disclaimer: NewTradingView.com, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2023 NewTradingView.com All Rights Reserved.


Back To Top
NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick