NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's Pick

MIKE DAVIS: FBI knew Mar-a-Lago raid was illegal, but Biden DOJ made them do it

by December 24, 2025
written by December 24, 2025

President Trump has faced unprecedented lawfare, including four indictments, two impeachments and countless lawsuits aimed at keeping him from power, confiscating his wealth and even putting him in prison for life. The most stark example? The FBI’s August 2022 raid of his Mar-a-Lago property. This week, we learned that even FBI agents did not believe there was probable cause for the sham raid.

The Fourth Amendment is fundamental to our Republic. The government cannot search or seize one’s home, office, papers or person without probable cause. Usually, authorities must obtain a search warrant prior to searching or seizing.

When the raid on Mar-a-Lago became public, lawfare opponents were horrified, for we had crossed the Rubicon. FBI agents rummaged through Trump’s personal effects and took his passport. They staged photos of folders supposedly containing classified information haphazardly strewn about and the Justice Department under then-President Biden released them to the media to cast Trump in a negative light.

The material in question consisted of records that Trump was allowed to maintain under the Presidential Records Act. A battle started between Trump and the National Archives, which wanted some of the documents. Biden’s White House Deputy Counsel Jonathan Su waived executive privilege, allowing the Biden Justice Department to begin an investigation. The Justice Department obtained a warrant to search for and seize the records, and Trump was indicted for allegedly unlawful retention of classified materials the following year.

The entire process was corrupt. First, the records were under Secret Service protection. Former presidents receive federal funds for secure office space so that they can maintain classified records. Former presidents, prior to Biden’s disgraceful decision to lock out Trump, were entitled to receive classified intelligence briefings. Trump allowed government officials to come to Mar-a-Lago to view the records and was opposed only to turning them over.

Second, the motive for the return of the records had nothing to do with security concerns. Trump had many records concerning Operation Crossfire Hurricane, the official name for the Obama-Clinton Russian Collusion Hoax. The 2016 campaign of Hillary Clinton cooked up the claim that Trump colluded with Russia to hack Clinton’s emails. Trump sued Clinton and the Democratic National Committee based on the Russia investigation.

Third, the warrant was a sham because the magistrate was not neutral and detached. Magistrate Judge Bruce Rinehart of the Southern District of Florida signed the warrant. Just six weeks earlier, Rinehart had recused himself from the Trump/Clinton lawsuit. The reason was obvious: Rinehart, while a civilian in 2017, had written a Facebook post viciously bashing Trump. The Biden Justice Department ran to a blatantly biased judge in order to procure the warrant.

This week, through documents released by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, we learned that even agents in the FBI’s Washington Field Office did not think that probable cause existed for the raid. The involvement of the Washington Field Office itself is scandalous. The alleged crime occurred in the Southern District of Florida. Yet, Biden special counsel Jack Smith used a D.C. grand jury to obtain subpoenas. D.C. voted for Trump’s opponents at a clip of 90% or more during the last three elections. Smith also went to shamelessly leftist D.C. Chief District Judges Beryl Howell and James Boasberg to obtain favorable rulings. Smith only indicted Trump in the Southern District of Florida because he feared that a D.C. conviction would get reversed over improper venue.

Florida District Judge Aileen Cannon invalidated Smith’s appointment on constitutional grounds. Then, Trump won a decisive electoral victory last November, and Smith ended his ignominious witch hunt, fleeing back to Europe.

The lawfare waged against Trump, his aides, his supporters, and even members of Congress, most blatant during Operation Arctic Frost, where nearly a dozen senators had their phone records seized, threatened to destroy the Republic. The lawfare perpetrators failed, however, and it is time for legal accountability in the form of an indictment for conspiracy against rights pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 241.

The government searched a former president’s home without probable cause to seize records in order to protect a corrupt former presidential candidate and to end the future political prospects of Trump. And the government procured the search warrant from a biased judicial disgrace who had no business anywhere near any case involving Trump. What occurred is a stain on the judiciary and the nation. Justice must, and will, come.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
New Trump admin envoy says US won’t ‘conquer’ Greenland, emphasizes talks with locals as Denmark balks at move
next post
Top 5 takeaways from latest Jeffrey Epstein files dump

You may also like

Obama wingman Eric Holder defended Walz’s vetting —...

January 15, 2026

Lindsey Graham calls for US to use ‘any...

January 15, 2026

Japan’s Prime Minister Takaichi plans to dissolve Parliament...

January 15, 2026

Top federal Minnesota prosecutors officially terminated after dispute...

January 15, 2026

DHS at center of progressive revolt as House...

January 15, 2026

Top Iranian official downplays death toll, blames ‘Israeli...

January 15, 2026

Iran allegedly airs 97 ‘coercive confessions’ amid record-breaking...

January 15, 2026

Key Republicans flip, kill effort to restrain Trump’s...

January 15, 2026

GOP senator’s Stop Fraud by SOMALIA Act would...

January 14, 2026

Republicans, Democrats say no to US military strike...

January 14, 2026
Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!




    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Gold and Silver: Gold remains stable in the $2420 zone

    • 2

      Oil and natural gas: Oil is back on the positive side

    • 3

      The dollar index continues to pull back to a new low

    • 4

      IonQ Stock Review: Should You Consider Investing Now?

    • 5

      Gold Price Surge Hits $3,385 Amid Trade Tensions

    Recent Posts

    • Obama wingman Eric Holder defended Walz’s vetting — then Minnesota’s fraud scandal erupted

      January 15, 2026
    • Lindsey Graham calls for US to use ‘any means necessary’ to stop the people behind the killing of Iranians

      January 15, 2026
    • US stocks open in the red: S&P down 0.5%, Nasdaq slips around 1%

      January 15, 2026
    • Bank of America Q4 beat estimates, but here’s why BAC stock may stay in red

      January 15, 2026
    • Copper, aluminum climb on supply worries, but Commerzbank sees setback risk

      January 15, 2026

    Categories

    • Economy (20)
    • Editor's Pick (415)
    • Investing (138)
    • Stock (20)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: NewTradingView.com, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 NewTradingView.com All Rights Reserved.


    Back To Top
    NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
    • Investing
    • Stock
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick