NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's Pick

Supreme Court keeps nation waiting on Trump tariff decision, releases 3 lower-profile opinions

by January 20, 2026
written by January 20, 2026

The U.S. Supreme Court left unresolved Tuesday a high-stakes challenge to President Donald Trump’s use of an emergency law to impose sweeping tariffs, prolonging uncertainty over a case closely watched by the White House and global markets.

The high court released three lower-profile opinions: Berk v. Choy, Ellingburg v. United States and Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton.

All three rulings were unanimous, with separate concurring opinions filed in two of the cases.

In Berk v. Choy, the justices looked at whether a Delaware law requiring medical malpractice plaintiffs to file an ‘affidavit of merit’ applies in federal court. The Court unanimously said it does not, ruling that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure control instead and override the state requirement.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson filed a concurring opinion.

In Coney Island Auto Parts v. Burton, the case centered on whether a company could challenge a judgment as void years later, or whether it waited too long to do so. The Court unanimously ruled that even claims arguing a judgment is void must be filed within a ‘reasonable time’ under federal rules.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.

And in Ellingburg v. United States, the justices considered whether court-ordered monetary restitution under a federal law counts as criminal punishment for purposes of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause. The justices unanimously agreed that it does, meaning restitution is subject to the Constitution’s limits on retroactive criminal punishment.

Anticipation for the Supreme Court tariff ruling is building after Trump threatened on his Truth Social platform to impose a 10% tariff on eight European countries unless a deal is reached for what he called the ‘complete and total purchase of Greenland.’

Trump has defended the tariffs as a necessary use of emergency authority, while challengers argue the move exceeds presidential power and bypasses Congress.

The Court has not yet announced when it will next release opinions.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
DOGE era overhaul: GSA touts $60B in savings as Trump shrinks gov’t footprint: ‘Results speak for themselves’
next post
Democrat senator accuses Trump of ‘declaring war’ on Minnesota with Insurrection Act threat

You may also like

Hawley targets Minnesota fraud, CCP-linked money at Senate...

February 10, 2026

What to know about Tuesday’s House hearing on...

February 10, 2026

Trump admin to repeal Obama-era greenhouse gas finding...

February 10, 2026

Senate races to avert third shutdown as DHS...

February 10, 2026

Iran draws missile red line as analysts warn...

February 10, 2026

As Ukraine war drags on, Trump hits Putin...

February 10, 2026

Jeffries accuses Republicans of ‘voter suppression’ over bill...

February 10, 2026

Epstein victims use Super Bowl commercial to pressure...

February 9, 2026

Hagerty urges FCC to punish Verizon over release...

February 9, 2026

Bipartisan Senate bill targets money laundering linked to...

February 9, 2026
Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!




    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Gold and Silver: Gold remains stable in the $2420 zone

    • 2

      Oil and natural gas: Oil is back on the positive side

    • 3

      The dollar index continues to pull back to a new low

    • 4

      IonQ Stock Review: Should You Consider Investing Now?

    • 5

      Gold Price Surge Hits $3,385 Amid Trade Tensions

    Recent Posts

    • What to know about Tuesday’s House hearing on foreign influence in American nonprofits: ‘Follow the money’

      February 10, 2026
    • Hawley targets Minnesota fraud, CCP-linked money at Senate hearing: ‘Taxpayers robbed blind’

      February 10, 2026
    • Trump admin to repeal Obama-era greenhouse gas finding in large-scale deregulation

      February 10, 2026
    • Iran draws missile red line as analysts warn Tehran is stalling US talks

      February 10, 2026
    • Senate races to avert third shutdown as DHS deal takes shape

      February 10, 2026

    Categories

    • Economy (20)
    • Editor's Pick (562)
    • Investing (241)
    • Stock (22)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: NewTradingView.com, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 NewTradingView.com All Rights Reserved.


    Back To Top
    NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
    • Investing
    • Stock
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick