NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's Pick

Supreme Court keeps nation waiting on Trump tariff decision, releases 3 lower-profile opinions

by January 20, 2026
written by January 20, 2026

The U.S. Supreme Court left unresolved Tuesday a high-stakes challenge to President Donald Trump’s use of an emergency law to impose sweeping tariffs, prolonging uncertainty over a case closely watched by the White House and global markets.

The high court released three lower-profile opinions: Berk v. Choy, Ellingburg v. United States and Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton.

All three rulings were unanimous, with separate concurring opinions filed in two of the cases.

In Berk v. Choy, the justices looked at whether a Delaware law requiring medical malpractice plaintiffs to file an ‘affidavit of merit’ applies in federal court. The Court unanimously said it does not, ruling that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure control instead and override the state requirement.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson filed a concurring opinion.

In Coney Island Auto Parts v. Burton, the case centered on whether a company could challenge a judgment as void years later, or whether it waited too long to do so. The Court unanimously ruled that even claims arguing a judgment is void must be filed within a ‘reasonable time’ under federal rules.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.

And in Ellingburg v. United States, the justices considered whether court-ordered monetary restitution under a federal law counts as criminal punishment for purposes of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause. The justices unanimously agreed that it does, meaning restitution is subject to the Constitution’s limits on retroactive criminal punishment.

Anticipation for the Supreme Court tariff ruling is building after Trump threatened on his Truth Social platform to impose a 10% tariff on eight European countries unless a deal is reached for what he called the ‘complete and total purchase of Greenland.’

Trump has defended the tariffs as a necessary use of emergency authority, while challengers argue the move exceeds presidential power and bypasses Congress.

The Court has not yet announced when it will next release opinions.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
DOGE era overhaul: GSA touts $60B in savings as Trump shrinks gov’t footprint: ‘Results speak for themselves’
next post
Democrat senator accuses Trump of ‘declaring war’ on Minnesota with Insurrection Act threat

You may also like

Vatican declines to join Trump’s Gaza ‘Board of...

February 18, 2026

Mike Lee calls Schumer’s ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ attack...

February 18, 2026

How did Jeffrey Epstein get rich? Meet Les...

February 18, 2026

Inside world’s top science society’s convention bashing Trump,...

February 18, 2026

Schumer, Dems’ goal is to ‘tie people down’...

February 17, 2026

Mark Kelly eyes 2028 White House run while...

February 17, 2026

House GOP’s razor-thin majority threatens to grind Trump’s...

February 17, 2026

Russia sentences American to 4 years for allegedly...

February 17, 2026

Iran signals nuclear progress in Geneva as Trump...

February 17, 2026

Psaki joins Democrat push for Epstein files after...

February 17, 2026
Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!




    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Gold and Silver: Gold remains stable in the $2420 zone

    • 2

      Oil and natural gas: Oil is back on the positive side

    • 3

      The dollar index continues to pull back to a new low

    • 4

      IonQ Stock Review: Should You Consider Investing Now?

    • 5

      Gold Price Surge Hits $3,385 Amid Trade Tensions

    Recent Posts

    • Vatican declines to join Trump’s Gaza ‘Board of Peace,’ calls for UN leadership

      February 18, 2026
    • Mike Lee calls Schumer’s ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ attack on voter ID bill ‘paranoid fantasy’

      February 18, 2026
    • How did Jeffrey Epstein get rich? Meet Les Wexner, the ex-Victoria’s Secret CEO who once worked with him

      February 18, 2026
    • Inside world’s top science society’s convention bashing Trump, pushing DEI, pronouns: ‘Felt like a funeral’

      February 18, 2026
    • House GOP’s razor-thin majority threatens to grind Trump’s Capitol Hill agenda to halt

      February 17, 2026

    Categories

    • Economy (20)
    • Editor's Pick (550)
    • Investing (251)
    • Stock (23)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: NewTradingView.com, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 NewTradingView.com All Rights Reserved.


    Back To Top
    NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
    • Investing
    • Stock
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick