NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Investing

Oil majors post mixed Q1 as Iran war distorts profits, product flows

by May 9, 2026
written by May 9, 2026

The world’s biggest oil companies delivered a turbulent set of first‑quarter earnings, underscoring how the war in Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz have distorted both profits and physical flows. 

While Shell and BP beat expectations on the back of strong trading and higher prices, ExxonMobil and Chevron reported headline profit declines, blaming “paper losses” from hedging mismatches.  

ExxonMobil and Chevron: Profits hit by timing effects  

ExxonMobil reported net income of $4.2 billion, down sharply from $7.7 billion a year earlier.

Adjusted earnings, however, came in at $8.8 billion, beating Wall Street forecasts. Revenue rose to $85.1 billion, reflecting higher crude prices. 

Chief executive Darren Woods said about 15% of Exxon’s production was disrupted by the war, with 750,000 barrels per day at risk if Hormuz remained closed.

Hedging losses of nearly $4 billion weighed on reported results, creating what he called a “timing effect.”  

“These are timing effects. The physical barrels will catch up, but the accounting impact is immediate.”

Chevron posted net income of $2.2 billion, compared with $3.5 billion last year.

Adjusted earnings of $1.41 per share beat consensus estimates, though revenue slipped to $48.6 billion. 

CEO Mike Wirth stressed Chevron’s lower exposure to Middle East operations, but acknowledged that hedging mismatches and deferred deliveries had distorted the quarter.  

“Our exposure to Middle East operations is limited, but the volatility in futures markets and deferred deliveries distorted reported earnings,” Wirth added. 

Shell: strong beat, buyback trimmed  

Shell stood out with adjusted earnings of $6.92 billion, comfortably above analyst expectations of $6.36 billion.

CEO Wael Sawan credited “relentless operational performance” despite unprecedented disruption. 

The company announced a $3 billion buyback program—slightly reduced from previous quarters—and a 5% dividend hike.

Net debt rose to $52.6 billion, reflecting higher working capital needs as oil prices surged.

Shell also confirmed its $16.4 billion acquisition of ARC Resources, expected to add 370,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day and support long‑term growth.  

Relentless operational performance allowed us to deliver strong results despite unprecedented disruption in global energy flows.

Wael Sawan
Chief Executive Officer at Shell

BP: Trading gains offset volatility  

BP reported underlying replacement cost profit of $3.2 billion, more than double the prior quarter, with reported profit at $3.8 billion. 

Strong oil trading and refining margins drove results, though net debt climbed to $25.3 billion due to a working capital build.

CEO Meg O’Neill emphasised BP’s resilience and reiterated capex guidance of $13–13.5 billion for 2026, alongside a commitment to annual dividend growth of at least 4%. 

Trading strength and refining margins offset volatility. Our balance sheet remains resilient even as working capital demands increased.

Meg O’Neill
Chief Executive Officer at BP

Analysts noted BP benefited from longer shipping routes and inventory swings caused by Hormuz disruptions, which boosted trading margins but strained cash flow.  

Conflict impact: futures vs physical barrels  

Across the majors, the Middle East war defined Q1 performance.

Futures markets priced in peace hopes quickly, sending oil benchmarks lower, but physical flows remained constrained. 

Rystad Energy estimated that even under a phased reopening of Hormuz, meaningful volume recovery would take six to eight weeks, keeping spot prices elevated.  

“Global physical supply of crude oil could take up to eight weeks to return to pre‑conflict levels. The price impact of a deal is being felt immediately in futures, but the physical market will take considerably longer to agree.”

Exxon and Chevron saw profits dented by hedging mismatches, Shell leveraged higher prices to beat forecasts, and BP capitalized on volatility through trading.

All four companies warned that geopolitical uncertainty would continue to shape results.  

Outlook  

The paradox for oil majors is clear: high prices support revenues, but logistical bottlenecks and hedging distortions weigh on reported profits. 

Investors are watching Exxon and Chevron for recovery once deferred profits are booked, Shell for integration of ARC Resources, and BP for sustained trading strength.  

With the Strait of Hormuz still unstable, second‑quarter earnings will hinge on whether peace talks translate into actual barrels reaching markets.

Until then, the majors remain caught between futures optimism and physical market constraints.  

The post Oil majors post mixed Q1 as Iran war distorts profits, product flows appeared first on Invezz

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
These 4 software stocks are pulling out of SaaSpocalypse now
next post
From cricket to capital: how the IPL became a $18.5B industry

You may also like

Nvidia owns the AI story, so why is...

May 9, 2026

Analysts see 200%+ upside in these 3 high-risk...

May 9, 2026

From cricket to capital: how the IPL became...

May 9, 2026

These 4 software stocks are pulling out of...

May 9, 2026

Intel stock supercharged after reports of preliminary deal...

May 8, 2026

Intel stock soars 8% on Friday: what’s behind...

May 8, 2026

Trade Desk stock: Cramer reveals a major red...

May 8, 2026

Tesla stock rises another 3%: what’s fueling the...

May 8, 2026

Why Microsoft stock is underperforming the broader market...

May 8, 2026

Innodata stock: why it may fail to sustain...

May 8, 2026
Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!




    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Gold and Silver: Gold remains stable in the $2420 zone

    • 2

      Oil and natural gas: Oil is back on the positive side

    • 3

      The dollar index continues to pull back to a new low

    • 4

      IonQ Stock Review: Should You Consider Investing Now?

    • 5

      Gold Price Surge Hits $3,385 Amid Trade Tensions

    Recent Posts

    • Nvidia owns the AI story, so why is AMD beating it on returns?

      May 9, 2026
    • Analysts see 200%+ upside in these 3 high-risk stocks: here’s why?

      May 9, 2026
    • From cricket to capital: how the IPL became a $18.5B industry

      May 9, 2026
    • Oil majors post mixed Q1 as Iran war distorts profits, product flows

      May 9, 2026
    • These 4 software stocks are pulling out of SaaSpocalypse now

      May 9, 2026

    Categories

    • Economy (20)
    • Editor's Pick (23)
    • Investing (797)
    • Stock (20)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: NewTradingView.com, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 NewTradingView.com All Rights Reserved.


    Back To Top
    NewTradingView.com – Investing and Stock News
    • Investing
    • Stock
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick